Re (133): CCW Licenses - Pros and Cons

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:17:50 GMT  <== RKBA ==> 

Boston T. Party at The Claire Files Forums - good conclusion of this thread, though I'll bet others will post. [clairefiles]

A pity that the 39 Shall Issue states didn't more closely study Vermont. They could have had steak, but settled for hamburger. And because of it, their bellies are full--too full for a steak.

Only Vermont has been eating 2nd Amendment steak all along.

...

I think the vast acceptance of Shall Issue has effectively put Vermont carry in a cul d'sac because CCW adherents stooped to/settled for a mere privilege instead of truly understanding how deeply their RKBA was at stake.

Privileges crowd out rights, and not just for the present. They crowd them out often for perpetuity because when mass numbers of people accept the privilege, enough of them become inurred to even the concept of rights in the matter.

For example, it is social lunacy to discuss your right--without licence--to drive a car or fly an airplane. (Regarding aviation, notice that nobody says that they "learned to fly" but that they got their "pilot's license." Nobody ever stops to wonder if the Federal Government ever had the constitutional authority to regulate intra-state aviation in the first place.) In an growing sphere of human activity, rights are fading as the normative value, and people are groveling for permits for nearly everything.

dgg9 et al may grudgingly acknowledge (after some prodding here) that CCWs are a privilege, but the next generation won't understand the distinction, or care. So, who will be fighting for Vermont carry then?

We got to storm a CCW hill and wipe out one of their battalions. Well, now that we occupy that hill, we're cut off and will become outflanked.

Add comment Edit post Add post