Gilmore Loses, but Court Reveals TSA Lie

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:10:27 GMT  <== Politics ==> 

PapersPlease.org - commentary on the decision (PDF) by the Ninth District Court of Appeals rejecting John Gilmore's case. You may travel without showing an identification card, but only if you become a "selectee" for search. And you can bet those searches will become extensive if lots of people choose them. Can you say, "Bend over and grease up"? Thought you could. Welcome to the new Amerika: secret laws, unwarranted search, travel papers. [picks]

The Court stated that if a citizen is unwilling to show ID at airports and is also unwilling to consent to an additional, arbitrary physical search, then that citizen is "free to leave" but not free to travel. That's not free.

Mr. Gilmore's favorite quote from the opinion reveals the convoluted decision-making process of the court: "...he would not be permitted to board the plane. There was no penalty...". So now we know: having your government hinder you from traveling in your own country is not a penalty.

Add comment Edit post Add post