Do they really aim to cancel the whole deal?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 03 Mar 2011 14:45:27 GMT  <== RKBA ==> 

Vin Suprynowicz - Vin reminds those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms that in so doing they remove the last vestige of the fedgov's authority. [westernrifleshooters]

But if the central government and its supporters now seek to unilaterally abrogate their promise to our forefathers that "Congress have no power to disarm the militia; their swords, and every other terrible instrument of the soldier, are the birth-right of an American," then finally they have UNDENIABLY abrogated the contract, and the people are henceforth morally and ethically free -- I do not say we are pragmatically free, since we are not, but that we are morally and ethically free -- to ignore every enactment, every levy and assessment of that central government as we choose, free of any obligation to make good the debts of a cynical cabal which no longer has any legitimate claim to our loyalty, our support, or our obedience, since they will have abrogated the one central purpose of the state -- to protect our RIGHTS.

My comment:

Which contract was that? The US Constitution? Never signed it. Doesn't apply to me.

But good on you for reminding the hoplophobes that 2A really does mean that there may be NO legislation infringing in any way the right of each and every one of us to keep and bear, meaning manufacture, sell, buy, possess, and carry, openly or concealed, always and everywhere, "every terrible instrument of the soldier."

Add comment Edit post Add post