The Claire Files Grand and Glorious Message Board

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:00:00 GMT
From kaba:
"For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution." [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822)

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownershp - Our Final Three Minutes ... - JPFO has completed all but the last three minutes of Innocents Betrayed. Just in time for the next convention on [the elimination of] small arms [for civilians]. Donate if you can to help finish and distribute this important film. [jpfo]

The Claire Files Grand and Glorious Message Board is on-line, compliments of The Mental Militia. A discussion board for fans of the ideas of Claire Wolfe. Yay! [claire]

John R. Lott at - There Are No Gun-Free, Safe Zones - "gun control" laws disarm the good guys. Don't buy the hype. But you're reading this, so I doubt you will. Eh? [lew]

Good intentions don't necessarily make good laws. What counts is whether the laws ultimately save lives. Unfortunately, too many gun laws primarily disarm law-abiding citizens, not criminals.

Ron Paul at - The Unbearable Cost of Running Iraq - now that the U.S. government has finished the easy part, ejecting Sadaam, we're stuck with the long, exceedingly expensive project of rebuilding his country. [lew]

Kim du Toit - Gratuitous Gun Pic: Thunder Five (.410ga) - a .410 gauge revolver. What'll they think of next? [kimdutoit]

Add comment Edit post Add post