Climatology and Voodoo

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:03:31 GMT  <== Politics ==> 

Jerry Pournelle - a sane perspective on the voodoo science of global warming. [pournelle]

The "Consensus" is actually not an actual consensus. Yes, most climate scientists will now agree if required to give an opinion that the Earth is more likely warming than cooling; that human activity very likely contributes to the warming; and that if there is a warming trend, and if it is as large as some think it is, the results could be very bad indeed. That is the actual extent of the consensus. There is no consensus on how much the Earth is warming; and even less on just how much human activity contributes. On Kyoto there is no consensus at all, since it is apparent to even casual observers that adopting Kyoto won't make any great difference in the warming trend no matter what the contribution of human activity to it might be.

Add comment Edit post Add post