Conspiracy Theories Anyone?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 20 Sep 2004 12:00:00 GMT
From rense:
"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder." -- Stanley Hilton

# Publicola - Push? - feel good that the AWB expired? So do I. Think it's time to rest on your laurels? Neither do I. Neither does Publicola. This thing could come back to bite us in a New York minute. [publicola]

# Stanley Hilton and Alex Jones via Rense.com - Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 911 Attacks - the text of an interview on Mr. Jones' radio show. Mirrored here. I take everything I see from Mr. Jones and Mr. Rense with a large grain of salt, but this is the most succinct and straightforward accusation I've seen to date of the Busheviks' complicity in the 9/11 murders. See www.deprogram.info and http://suetheterrorists.net/ for more information. [grabbe]

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

# Barbara Hartwell at Rumor Mill News - Warning from Mike Ruppert - I'd think Ruppert and Hilton would be on the same side, but apparently not. Mr. Ruppert suspects the accuracy of the Jones/Hilton interview. [whatreallyhappened]

It is my strong belief that Stanley Hilton is the Daniel Sheehan of the new century and that anyone who allies with him will be as discredited and broke as those who supported the Christic Institute. He has rounded up 400 victim families and he will destroy their case exactly the same way that Sheehan destroyed Martha Honey's and all who were involved in that one. As for Alex Jones I still want to believe that he is just over-energized, careless and sloppy. But even at that he is playing directly into the opposition's hands.

Hilton's discourse was the most unrpofessional dialogue I have ever heard from a lawyer in a public setting. And the man was a close colleague of Bob Dole. Does anyone get the picture?

Add comment Edit post Add post