LEAP
"The greater part of our happiness or misery depends on our dispositions, and not our circumstances." -- Martha Washingtonand:
"We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money." -- Davy Crockettand:
"They tell me that if, somehow or another, I don't respect this doctrine of the 'separation of church and state,' I am disrespecting the Constitution. I sat down again the other day. I scoured the document -- it's not very long, by the way. ... That was the brilliance of our Founders. ... I scoured it. I looked through it once, I looked through it twice. I looked through it a dozen times. I didn't find a single mention of this "separation!" -- Alan Keyes
From kaba:
"One man with courage is a majority." -- Thomas Jefferson
Troy Record Editorial - Got an illegal gun? Go directly to jail, do not pass go - The Record touts the Capital Region's new "Project Fed Up" program. I wrote the following letter to the editor: [kaba]
The August 19 editorial pushed "Project Fed Up", a rat-out-your-neighbor program that would increase penalties for so-called "gun crimes". I'm fed up with constant infringements on my God-given right to keep and bear arms.
Remind me, in a country where the second amendment to the Constitution says that "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed", what is an illegal gun? Isn't every law proclaiming any gun to be illegal unconstitutional on its face, hence null and void?
I believe that criminals should be held accountable for their crimes, but why does the tool you use to commit a crime have anything to do with the restitution you owe to the victim? If you stole property, you are responsible for returning or replacing it. If you harmed a person, you are responsible for making them whole. If you killed a person, your life is forfeit. Whether you used a knife, a screwdriver, a brick, a gun, or your bare hands has nothing whatsoever to do with it.
The problem isn't too many bad guys with guns. The problem is too few good guys with guns. Too few citizens who carry always and everywhere and are willing to defend against criminal action. Too many unconstitutional laws that make this difficult to do.
New York needs to follow the examples of Vermont and Alaska, rescind the Sullivan Act, and encourage every law-abiding adult to carry the weapon of their choice, openly or concealed, always and everywhere, no license or permit required.
Nina Shapiro at Seattle Weekly via Alternet - Cops Against the Drug War - a story about Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, LEAP, lead by Jack Cole, formerly an undercover New Jersey cop. [smith2004]
"Eighty-five percent of the crime associated with drugs is not associated with people using drugs. It has to do with the marketplace," says Peter Christ, a former police officer in New York state who originated the idea of LEAP. Turf wars, smuggling, violent bill collection -- all are typical drug-related crimes that are not the result of being high. Moreover, LEAP argues, the illegality of drugs has inflated their value to a point where addicts have to steal to get their fix. "If we put 50-gallon drums out on every street corner in America filled with drugs, we wouldn't have the problems we have today," Christ says.
At the same time, LEAP argues that the prohibition has kept society from regulating drugs in a way that keeps them out of the hands of children, for whom it's easier to buy cocaine than it is to buy beer. As in the alcohol industry, LEAP says, legalization would also allow the government to license and monitor businesses that sell drugs and to set product standards that would prevent most overdoses. Says Christ, "When you go to buy a bottle of Jack Daniels, you don't have to wonder if there's a quart of antifreeze in it or rat poison." Legalization would further allow the government to tax this billion-dollar industry and use the proceeds for drug treatment programs.