LAX Immigration Nazis

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Wed, 08 May 2002 12:00:00 GMT
From smith2004:
Anarchism is founded on the observation that since few men are wise enough to rule themselves, even fewer are wise enough to rule others. -- Edward Abbey

From kaba:

Texas Agriculture Commissioner Jim Hightower, when told that Texas Governor Bill Clements had been studying Spanish said, "Oh good. Now he'll be bi-ignorant."

Ricardo Abude E. da Silva at Rense.com - Atrocities In American Airports - a Brazilian citizen describes his treatment at the hands of i.n.s. agents at LAX on February 24, 2002. Despicable. All the agents involved (except Victor) should be lined up against the wall and shot. Mirrored here. [smith2004]

Marc Grossman at U.S. Department of State - American Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court - Remarks to the Center for Strategic and International Studies officially withdrawing the United States from the International Criminal Court. Very good news.

Kent Snyder at U.S. Newswire - Citizens' Group Applauds Bush's Decision Renouncing America's Participation With International Criminal Court - The Liberty Committee congratulates the Bush administration on un-signing the International Criminal Court Treaty. They are renewing a push to pass H.R.4169, Ron Paul's "American Servicemember and Citizen Protection Act of 2002".

SEC. 5. PROTECTION OF MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES AND UNITED STATES CITIZENS AND NATIONALS.
(a) ACTIONS AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES- Any action taken by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court against any member of the United States Armed Forces shall be considered to be an act of aggression against the United States.

(b) ACTIONS AGAINST UNITED STATES CITIZENS OR NATIONALS- Any action taken by or on behalf of the International Criminal Court against any individual who is a citizen or national of the United States shall be considered to be an offense against the law of nations.

Ernie Hancock intends to get arrested today when he goes to the Arizona Department of Revenue, armed, to drop off his taxes. He will insist that they allow him to enter the building armed or that they check his weapon. He expects them to do neither. [smith2004]

L. Neil Smith - Why Did it Have to be ... Guns? - periodic reading of this piece is good for the soul.

Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put.

If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.

If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.

What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?

If he doesn't want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?

Aaron Zelman at JPFO - You Won the Battle But Lost the War - an open letter to America's veterans. They came home victorious from World War II, but America has become as bad as the countries they defeated. [jpfo]

Robert A. Waters at Sierra Times - Fighting back: Lessons from the Un-Armed Victims - people who don't fight back are often killed. Arm yourself. Fight back. [sierra]

Add comment Edit post Add post