Who needs the 'Megabucks'?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:21:52 GMT
FROM MOUNTAIN MEDIA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATED JUNE 26, 2001
THE LIBERTARIAN, By Vin Suprynowicz
Who needs the 'Megabucks'?

Here in Las Vegas, Dale Askew has served as Clark County manager for four years. He's never held favor with all seven elected commissioners. Finally tired of trying to serve so many masters, Mr. Askew this week retired with some dignity and grace, and was quickly replaced by unanimous commission vote with UNLV government professor and former county administrator Thom Reilly.

At the time of his departure, Mr. Askew was drawing a comfortable salary of $156,418. Based on that salary, a county spokesman says he could have expected to draw a pension of $65,000 per year.

Mr. Askew is 56 years old and in good health, so far as is known. This is not an old sailor being set ashore with ravaged health and a peg leg. Mr. Askew should have little trouble finding gainful employment with any number of lobbying or consulting firms should he so desire. He could even, presumably, take up Thom Reilly's newly vacated post at the university, if he do desired.

And even should he take to his rocking chair, many are the Clark County residents who'd be happy to live on $65,000 per year and never have to drive to work again.

(As one letter-writer put it this week, adding in Mr. Askew's 14 years of experience in junior posts, "I served 30 years in the U. S. Air Force, flew tours of combat in two wars, was subjected to isolated tours of duty, long separations from my family, lived in primitive, austere surroundings and witnessed many of my comrades killed and others taken prisoner. My pension is barely half of what Mr. Askew will receive for having served 18 years in air conditioned comfort, safely ensconced in the county office building.")

Yet even that pension was not enough for the very county commissioners who have been maneuvering for years to get Mr. Askew out. Oh no. Instead, the commissioners voted Tuesday to make an additional $178,000 payment of taxpayer funds into the Public Employees Retirement System on Mr. Askew's behalf, "buying" him three years more seniority on his pension, as a result of which he will receive an annual old-age retirement check of not $65,000, but $78,000.

Should Mr. Askew draw that pension until he's 75, he will net an extra $247,000.

Is that some great bargain? Would any local banker have trouble turning $178,000 into $247,000 over the next 19 years? More importantly, why do the county commissioners keep doing this? Would they really like the motto "Hey, what the hell, it's only TAX money" carved in stone above the entrance to the grandiose, custom-designed auditorium where theyn now conduct their business?

Some may respond that this only mimics the buy-out Mr. Askew might have received if he'd taken advantage of the early retirement plan the county has been offering certain employees in recent years, supposedly in hopes of replacing highly-paid senior staff with lower-paid replacements.

But that offer never applied to Mr. Askew. There's no evidence he couldn't have been gotten rid of without the promise of such a payoff. And most of all -- even assuming Mr. Reilly will keep his new job for seven years -- it would be necessary to pay the new county manager an average of no more than $131,000 over the next seven years ($25,000 less or year than Mr. Askew's current salary) in order to save $178,000 ... which (given all those automatic COLAs and longevity pay hikes) would probably mean starting the new county manager at less than $100,000.

What are the chances?

The Clark County Commission has just stolen an unauthorized $178,000 from the taxpayers -- a clear violation of their fiduciary duty -- to retire in the lap of luxury a county bureaucrat they didn't even like. What on earth will they do if a county manager they like ever retires -- just open the windows and start dumping buckets of cash into the amphitheater?

As another letter writer correctly put it this week, "It sure is nice to be able to give away money when it is not your own. I only hope people will remember when it's election time."

Finally, the minority of commissioners who complained about Mr. Reilly's being hired on the "good old boy" system, without benefit of any formal search or interview process, got that one right.

"It is a disservice to Mr. Reilly," commented Bruce Woodbury, who has now been a county commissioner for longer than anyone else in local history. "It's a disservice to those of us who were not consulted, and to the community, to not open this up to others to apply. I don't think that it is good government."

Mr. Woodbury was right to object, as were Yvonne Atkinson Gates and freshman Chip Maxfield. So why on earth didn't they all vote "No," instead of going along and "making it unanimous"?

It's allowed, you know.


Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Subscribe to his monthly newsletter by sending $72 to Privacy Alert, 1475 Terminal Way, Suite E for Easy, Reno, NV 89502 -- or dialing 775-348-8591. His book, "Send in the Waco Killers: Essays on the Freedom Movement, 1993-1998," is available at 1-800-244-2224, or via web site www.thespiritof76.com/wacokillers.html.


Vin Suprynowicz, vin@lvrj.com

"When great changes occur in history, when great principles are involved, as a rule the majority are wrong. The minority are right." -- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926)

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken

Add comment Edit post Add post