German New Medicine
Ryke Geerd Hamer has a new way of thinking about cancer. Interesting. Don't know if it's valid. But I definitely agree with one of his principles. Don't panic the patient with tales of impending doom. [skype]
Dr. Hamer's research began in 1979 after the tragic loss of his son Dirk (see Biography). Shortly after Dirk's death, Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with testicular cancer. Since he had never been seriously ill, he assumed that the development of his cancer could be directly related to the traumatic event he had experienced. At that time Dr. Hamer was head internist of a cancer clinic at the University of Munich, Germany. There he began to systematically study his patients regarding the causes, development and healing process of their cancers. What he discovered was revolutionary!
Dr. Hamer found that every DISEASE originates from an unexpected shock experience. He established that such a sudden shock affects not only the psyche, but impacts at the same time (visible on a brain scan) the part of the brain that corresponds biologically to the specific trauma. Whether the body responds to the unexpected event with a tumor growth (cancer), with tissue degeneration, or with functional loss, is determined by the exact type of conflict shock. So far, Dr. Hamer has been able to confirm these discoveries with over 40,000 case studies. Since HEALING can only occur after the conflict has been resolved, German New Medicine® therapy focuses on identifying and resolving the original shock.
Another webpage about Hamer
Here is a more complete page about Hamer and his "germanic new medecine" including many references:
http://www.ariplex.com/nmwiki/index.php?title=New_Germanic_Medicine
regards to all
Previous Posts:
Microchip Implants Cause Fast-Growing, Malignant Tumors in Lab Animals
NRA Director Says Five Rounds is Enough
Gun Control Question
California outlaws the forced subdermal RFID tagging of humans
Ron Paul's Inaugural Address
Quote
An Idea Whose Time Has Come
A Time To Serve: The Case for National Service
The Truth About Tytler
Edwards backs mandatory preventive care
The GNM, quackpots and pseudo-skeptics (debunkers)
The GNM seems to be a very interesting theory. I think emotional factors are very important in the origin (and treatment) of many disease. I don't know if ALL cancers are caused by conflicts shocks (as Dr.Hamer says), but maybe most of them are. Only scientific research will tell us.
However, most attacks on the GNM and other alternative theories are based on rhetoric and ad hominem attacks. It's important to know that conventional medicine have a front group of propagandists (so-called quackbusters), who try to spread disinformation about alternative medicine. Most of these quackpots have been exposed in US courts:
http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html
http://www.healthfreedomlaw.com/
http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/barrettvsrosenthal.htm
http://www.quackpotwatch.org/
They try to cover the serious deficiences of the conventional medicine and health care system:
http://www.noblindmen.com/Is%20US%20Health%20Really%20the%20Best.htm
Most of them are active members of so-called "skeptics" groups (also know as "paranormal" debunkers):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoskepticism
http://www.anomalist.com/commentaries/pseudo
http://www.skepticalinvestigations.org/anomalistics/practices.htm
http://www.fiu.edu/~mizrachs/truzzi.html
http://members.aol.com/ddrasin/zen.html
http://www.discord.org/~lippard/stupid-skeptic-tricks.txt
http://paginas.terra.com.br/educacao/criticandokardec/criticizingskepticism.htm
http://www.rense.com/general51/seek3.htm
It's important to know in depth the "skeptic" agenda, their rhetorical tricks and dialectical ploys (to win arguments) and typical pseudo-rationalistic dogmatism, because most of them aren't reliable and objective source of information about alternative theories in science and we need to identify them. Their purpose is to debunk, attack, and difame any alternative theory and their supporters or researchers. They don't critize any aspect of conventional medicine neither of conventional science.
More info on Dr.Hamer's theories may be read here:
http://membres.lycos.fr/biologie/english/welcome.htm
Kind regards
Edit comment