Bush Moves Toward Martial Law
Frank Morales at Uruknet - on the same day that Bushnev signed the Military Commissions Act, eliminating habeus corpus on a whim, he signed H.R.5122, the "John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007", which, buried in Section 1076, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies", eliminates the Posse Comitatus Act, allowing His Eminence to use the military to quash domestic distrubances. [grabbe]
EC. 1076. USE OF THE ARMED FORCES IN MAJOR PUBLIC EMERGENCIES.
(a) Use of the Armed Forces Authorized-
(1) IN GENERAL- Section 333 of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
`Sec. 333. Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law
`(a) Use of Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies- (1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to--
`(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that--
`(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and
`(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or
`(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).
`(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that--
`(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
`(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
`(3) In any situation covered by paragraph (1)(B), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Previous Posts:
Just For Furriners
The Voting Ritual
Quote
Quote
Bill Maher Smacks Around Some NeoCons
New Media and Party Affiliation
Security Theater of the Absurd
Election 2006: Staying Home
Countdown Special Comment: Death of Habeas Corpus: "Your words are lies, Sir."
Keith Olbermann DEMANDS Bush Apologize 9/18/06