Building a Grand Strategy for Restoring the 2nd Amendment
AIM_SMALL_MISS_SMALL at The Gun Blogs - interesting idea. Wish him luck. Won't hold my breath. [gunblogs]
So if America's anti-gun folks agree that every law-abiding person has the right to exist and even the right to defend his existence, and if they agree that the 2nd Amendment seems to recognize that right (I say "recognize," not "grant"), what do they get stuck on?
The anti-gun crowd fails to see the necessary connection between being free and being able to use lethal force at any given moment, if need be, for the sake of remaining free (and/or alive).
(I include in the anti-gun crowd people who are not deeply committed but who simply don't actively support full, free exercise of the 2nd Amendment.)
What they fail to see, therefore, is exactly what we need to show them in order to win them over. Namely, that it is healthy and normal to feel a bit squeamish about using potentially lethal force on someone, but that it is not only justifiable but their duty to do so--since the SCOTUS has ruled that government has no specific duty to protect individuals and it is morally wrong to burden other people with your duties if it was at all within your means in the first place to prevent so burdening them.
Previous Posts:
In Grendel's Lair
&^%$#@ing civic jingoism
That neurotic beast, the writer (aka starting a new book project)
Return to Hardyville
Renee Boje Finally Free in Canada
Nullification Redux
How Many Lightbulbs Does it Take to Change the World? One. And You're Looking At It.
An Open Letter from KT Ordnance
California Seeks to Clear Hemp of a Bad Name
Clinton Got a Blow Job