Stop Cooperating

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 13:00:00 GMT
From this Claire Files post:
"We aren't going to get anywhere. Individuals are going to get there. One at a time they will realize that politics, that the state, that the concept of a group of people, no matter how large, having any control whatsoever over the peaceful choices of another group of people, no matter how small, is wrong. And they will stop cooperating with it. They will stop paying taxes. They will stop voting. They will stop obeying police officers. They will stop submitting to registration or licensing of any kind. They will completely ignore all legislation. And they will start shooting and stabbing and hanging and otherwise eliminating anyone and everyone they can't avoid who attempts to control them." -- Bill St. Clair

From clairefiles:

"If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: no federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid. We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the 'poor'; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no NAFTA, GATT, or 'fast-track'; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; no income tax . We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited." -- Ron Paul (1998)

# Claire Wolfe at Backwoods Home Magazine - The Hardy Awards 2005 - Claire, Wally Conger, and Oliver del Signore counted the votes and awarded the trophies. [claire]

# Claire Wolfe - Dear Free State Project - Claire declares that she will not move to New Hampshire unless the original goal of 20,000 participants is reached by September of 2006. Jason Sorens replied via a Claire Files Forums post. [claire]

# National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) - Denver Votes To Abolish Pot Penalties - by 54%. Teluride voted down (by 24 votes) a similar initiative to make enforcing marijuana prohibition the lowest law enforcement priority.

# Andrew S. Fischer at LewRockwell.com - Arrested for What? - there used to be a time when arresting someone for having an arbitrarily set blood-alcohol level would be illegal. The drunk driver hasn't actually done anything wrong yet. Yes, he might do something wrong, but until he does, no crime has been committed and his actions are nobody's business. Now if the cop actually witnesses bad driving, that's another thing. Unsafe driving is an initiation of force for whatever reason the driver is doing it, too much to drink, too little sleep, too little intelligence, argument with wife or kids, too much attention on cell phone call, etc. etc. But criminalizing activities that might cause unsafe driving or unsafe anything is just plain wrong. Like gun "control", it's blaming the tool instead of its user. [lew]

Seems to me that either you can arrest someone before he does something, or you can't. If you buy into the former case, then what are the limits?

Add comment Edit post Add post