Patriots or Traitors?

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Thu, 27 Dec 2001 13:00:00 GMT
russmo.com - Gifts from Santa - cartoon commentary on Congress' gift to the War Department.

Tibor R. Machan at Laissez Faire City Times - Reflections on Freedom & Responsibility - a good exploration of the relationship of rights and responsibilities in a free society. Why turning responsibilities into legal obligations is a really bad idea.

That's where liberty and responsibility come together -- in a free society our responsibilities must be a matter of choice. Whether we eat right, smoke or not, exercise or not, get educated, are generous and charitable to those in need or are decent to our friends, neighbors, employees, customers and so on -- all of these are not to be a matter of law but of free choice.

...

When the folks criticize the free society for not emphasizing responsibilities, the proper response is that in fact the free society emphasizes moral responsibilities far more than any regimented society does. But it insists that the responsibility be a matter of the individual's choice, not fulfilled at the point of a gun. It may be encouraged through persuasion, upbringing, some measure of peer pressure and argument. If your friends misbehave, and you start hinting that that's not kosher, that's a peaceful way of trying to influence them. If you go and clobber them over the head, that's not peaceful, uncivilized.

Russell Madden at Laissez Faire City Times - A Merry Un-PC Christmas - nowadays it's considered politically incorrect to celebrate Christmas openly. Mr. Madden encourages us to ignore that folly. He, an atheist, wishes everyone a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Bravo!

John McCabe at loony dot org - Oops, I did it again - An account of Mr. McCabe's annual visit to church for Christmas mass.

Then, it happened.

"No other religion in the world--in the history of world religions--has a God such as ours...that he would humble himself [to such a degree] as to take human form."

I have to admit I didn't hear very much after that statement. I was too busy sautéing in my seat.

Sarah Thompson at Sierra Times - Stop the Olympic Gun Ban! - a report on Utah banning guns at the Olympics. They are even banning privately supplied storage lockers. [sierra]

Ed Lewis at KeepAndBearArms.com - Patriots or Traitors - That is the question - long article on the abomination called the USA PATRIOT act.

Remember this if nothing else: Not even the President of the United States has the authority to issue an order to any human being unless the human being is in the direct employ of the Executive Branch of the US Government as a civil or military servant to the people; and never does he have the authority to order to deprive citizens of their rights. The authority to order we sovereigns around is not in the Constitution. It makes no difference whether it is in a time of a declared war or any other emergency. If he did have the authority, the Constitution would state it. He is not a king -- he is merely an official who has the task of assuring that the rights of the individual are not infringed upon. He simply hasn't the authority to make a law, which is what an order to an individual would have to be based on.

...

Above all -- and never to be forgotten or ignored -- no law by any level of government may be made that is repugnant to the Constitution for the united States of America. In other words -- and to reiterate for those in government who apparently haven't any command of the English language -- if a law infringes upon a right of any one sovereign, it is unconstitutional and no law at all according to American Jurisprudence.

"Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it; No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." (16 Am Jur 2nd 177).

Therefore, a proposed law containing even one unconstitutional provision should never be considered by Congress or State legislators or the governing body of political subdivisions as a law but should have be trashed immediately for its unconstitutionality. No word games should be permitted which lend to its passage. Furthermore, word games should not be used by any court or other entity -- including the media -- in defense of any fraudulent "law" already passed that is more or less taken as "public policy".

...

The war against terrorism and for freedom is anything but that. How can it be when Congress does not even read a bill written possibly by people a decade ago that effectively removes the rights secured by the Constitution? Call Homeland Security what it really is -- Fatherland Security -- the establishment of the American Gestapo through unconstitutional laws. No more is the intent to preserve rights but is -- instead -- to suppress all human rights.

This is the set up and what will be -- except that it doesn't take into account the 25% of the people who do think for themselves, that do know the frauds perpetrated and perpetuated by the federal government have been with the intent of establishing complete totalitarian control over the people of the world. It is with those people that hope for the goodness in mankind still exists.

And, even though 25% of the military has indicated its willingness to kill American citizens who do not want to comply with unconstitutional proceedings, such as forced firearm confiscation, there is the 75% who will not. Hopefully, the 75% know who the 25% are and will work to disarm and corral them rather than the American public when the time comes.

Ap via The Winston-Salem Journal - Durham man charged with murder in shooting of suspected burglar - man hears burgler, man steps into front yard, burgler attacks man with brick, man shoots burgler, police arrest man and hold him without bond on murder charge. What's wrong with this picture? Hopefully a grand jury will sort it out, and soon. [kaba]

Add comment Edit post Add post