000611.html
American Skin / 41 Shots*
*Lyrics performed by Bruce Springsteen in Atlanta on June 4.
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots
41 shots and we'll take that ride
41 shots
41 shots
41 shotsLena gets her son ready for school
She says now on these streets Charles
You got to understand the rules
Promise me if an officer stops you'll always be polite
Never ever run away and promise mama you'll keep your hands in sight(Chorus)
Cause is it a gun?
Is it a knife?
Is it a wallet?
This is your life
It ain't no secret
It ain't no secret
The secret my friend
You can get killed just for living in your American skin(41 shots-3 times)
Across this bloody river to the other side
41 shots they cut through the night
You're kneeling over his body in the vestibule
Praying for his life(Chorus)
(41 shots-3 times)
(Repeat Lena verse)
(Chorus)
(41 shots-3 times)
(Chorus)41 shots and we'll take that ride
Across this bloody river to the other side
41 shots my boots caked in mud
We're baptized in these waters and in each other's bloodIt ain't no secret
Is it a knife?
Is it a wallet?
This is your life
It ain't no secret
It ain't no secret
The secret my friend
You can get killed just for living in
You can get killed just for living in
You can get killed just for living in your American skin(41 shots-8 times)
S. 2612, The Ecstasy Anti-Proliferation Act of 2000, still isn't available at Thomas.
Steven Yates at LewRockwell.com - Dear Lynn: a letter to a co-worker on her return to college about how to survive in today's bastions of political correctness. A nice light touch on a truly disgusting topic. [lew]
Thomas L. Friedman at the New York Times via Free Republic - The Young And the Clueless: One statist's views on the Microsoft breakup.
For many in Silicon Valley, government is irrelevant at best and obstructionist at worst. For many in the high-tech community, the world runs on electrons and stock options, and government is basically an institution of tax-seeking bloodsuckers. The idea that none of Silicon Valley's innovations would ever have flowered without the rule of law maintained by Washington or without the global stability maintained by the U.S. military -- funded by U.S. taxpayer dollars -- is really a foreign notion to many in the dot-com world. Tell techies that without America on duty there would be no America Online and they will look at you as if you were speaking Latin (or Fortran).Not! What's amazing is that the high-tech industry managed to do what it has in spite of the government. Lots of good comments by freepers. [lew]
Albert Burns at Sierra Times - Just a Matter of Time: An article about the treaty loophole in the constitution. I noticed this a while back. The constitution says that a treaty that is ratified by the senate becomes part of the constitution. No 2/3 majority in both houses, no vote by state legislatures. Mr. Burns reminds us of the Bricker Amendment, which closes this loophole. [sierra]
Lew Rockwell at WorldNetDaily - 'Death tax' repeal a hoax: Yesterday I pointed at Ron Paul's article about the death tax being repealed. Today Mr. Rockwell tells us that it's original language did indeed repeal the death tax, but that a late-in-the-game amendment may have actually made it worse. I find it hard to understand the language, but it appears to be there. If you're interested in such details, go to H.R.8, click on the third link, "Engrossed in House", then click on "TITLE I--REPEAL OF ESTATE, GIFT, AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TAXES; REPEAL OF STEP UP IN BASIS AT DEATH". Mr. Rockwell's interpretation of this section is that the inheritor has to pay capital gains taxes on inherited property using the basis price of the donor, not the value at death. This hugely increases that tax. [wnd]
Plan 9 is available from Bell labs as open source. Appears to be Intel only, but they say it runs on my work laptop. Tempting... There are a bunch of papers at Plan 9 Manual - Volume 2. From the one entitled Plan 9 from Bell Labs: [wes]
Plan 9 began in the late 1980's as an attempt to have it both ways: to build a system that was centrally administered and cost-effective using cheap modern microcomputers as its computing elements. The idea was to build a time-sharing system out of workstations, but in a novel way. Different computers would handle different tasks: small, cheap machines in people's offices would serve as terminals providing access to large, central, shared resources such as computing servers and file servers. For the central machines, the coming wave of shared-memory multiprocessors seemed obvious candidates. The philosophy is much like that of the Cambridge Distributed System [NeHe82]. The early catch phrase was to build a UNIX out of a lot of little systems, not a system out of a lot of little UNIXes.
Previous Posts:
000514.html
000510.html
000512.html
000507.html
000509.html
new
bottom
000502.html
000428.html
000423.html