FAQ

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Fri, 30 May 2003 14:46:52 GMT
I label myself as a "crypto-anarcho-libertarian". Crypto because I've made my living for 25 years programming computers. Anarcho because anarcho-capitalism is the only political philosophy I've encountered that looks to me to have a chance of actually working in the real world. Libertarian because I believe in the Zero Aggression Principle (ZAP): "No human being has the right -- under any circumstances -- to initiate force against another human being, nor to threaten or delegate its initiation."

I could live with the constitutional republic envisioned by America's founders if the Constitution were narrowly interpreted and rabidly enforced. This means that any legislator, executive, bureaucrat, cop, or judge who violates his oath to defend and protect the Constitution should be tried for that crime. If convicted, he should be jailed and forever banned from holding any sworn position. This means that at least 90% of the current crop of congress critters in Washington should be rotting in a jail cell.


I don't tend to have heroes, but if I had to pick one, L. Neil Smith would probably come as close as anyone. Check out my L. Neil Smith quotes page. And join the discussion at smith2004.


I started this weblog in opposition to the war on (some) drugs. Lately, I rant more often about the war on the right to defend yourself, your family, and your neighborhood, known by the Brady Bunch as "gun control".


I attended the Million Marijuana March on May 1, 1999 and again on May 6, 2000. I wore my kufi and carried a sign that said "End the War on Freedom" on one side and "Legalize Liberty" on the other. I don't believe the war on (some) drugs has anything to do with drugs. It is a war on freedom, a war on the bill of rights, a war on America's soul. End it. To quote Vin Suprynowicz:

This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion.

John Gilmore also says it very well:

I believe that mind-altering drugs should be usable and sellable under the same rules and the same taxes that apply to substances like flour, sugar and coffee. If the label says it's pure Humboldt County marijuana of 18% THC content, then it had better really contain that, or the seller is in legal trouble. Otherwise, no restrictions, no special taxes, no more black markets. If someone consumes a drug in a way that damages people around them (or seriously threatens to), they should be held responsible -- whether the drug is coffee, alcohol, or cocaine.

This site is a place for me to write down whatever feels important each day.

Enjoy!

Here's my mug:

BillStClair: A picture of me taken at work for inclusion in a company portfolio.

Add comment Edit post Add post