No SWAT: The most important Supreme Court case you've never heard about

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:32:24 GMT  <== Politics ==> 

Radley Balko at Slate - sometime this spring, the Supremes will consider Hudson v. Michigan. At issue is whether evidence collected as the result of a no-knock raid is admissable in court. Given that Bushnev has now stacked the court with fascists, I predict that they will rule the evidence admissable, driving another nail into the Fourth Amendment's coffin. Mr. Balko gives a good history of other Fourth Amendment cases.

The proper decision of course is that a homeowner has the right to shoot dead anybody who enters his home without a proper warrant and without properly announcing himself, and no evidence so collected is admissable. Even in a proper search, no evidence not listed in the warrant should be admissable. A homeowner who defends himself and his family by killing an invader deserves commendation, no matter which breed of vermin, uniformed or not, breaks into his house. [picks]

Add comment Edit post Add post