No SWAT: The most important Supreme Court case you've never heard about
Radley Balko at Slate - sometime this spring, the Supremes will consider Hudson v. Michigan. At issue is whether evidence collected as the result of a no-knock raid is admissable in court. Given that Bushnev has now stacked the court with fascists, I predict that they will rule the evidence admissable, driving another nail into the Fourth Amendment's coffin. Mr. Balko gives a good history of other Fourth Amendment cases.
The proper decision of course is that a homeowner has the right to shoot dead anybody who enters his home without a proper warrant and without properly announcing himself, and no evidence so collected is admissable. Even in a proper search, no evidence not listed in the warrant should be admissable. A homeowner who defends himself and his family by killing an invader deserves commendation, no matter which breed of vermin, uniformed or not, breaks into his house. [picks]
Previous Posts:
Not Our Debt
Fukitol
The Immigration Crisis: It's the Fault of Bad Law
Federal Reserve Orders Two Trillion Dollars To Be Printed and Put into Circulation!
Rose Wilder Lane: The Discovery of Freedom
Simplicity and prosperity: Observations while on the road
Money & Banking Resources
Update in re Angel
Dancing GIF
New Virtualization Vendor