Sen. Reid fears we'd only 'squander' proposed Bush tax cut

Submitted by Bill St. Clair on Mon, 28 May 2001 10:03:24 GMT

FROM MOUNTAIN MEDIA
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DATED MARCH 20, 2001
THE LIBERTARIAN, By Vin Suprynowicz
Sen. Reid fears we'd only 'squander' proposed Bush tax cut

One thinks of some bizarre old horror film, in which the aging animal-trainer cannot imagine giving up either his furry friends or the little act which has supported him through the years (delighting young and old alike.) So he insists on going through the motions of setting up his little horns and balls and flaming hoops, at which point (to the sound of pre-recorded drum roll and fanfare) he brings out and begins issuing loud and cheerful commands -- the crowd first murmuring and then recoiling in dawning awareness and escalating horror -- to the stiff, embalmed remains of his long-dead animal friends.

Speaking before about 1,000 municipal officials gathered from around the country at the Washington Hilton Hotel on March 12, U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., tried to re-stage the old Democratic dog-and-pony show about the evils of tax cuts, asserting that "To take all this money that we have in the way of surpluses and squander it on the tax cut is really the wrong way to go. ... Don't you think it's a better idea to spend that money on our water systems and sewer systems than to give Bill Gates a bigger tax break?"

Sen. Reid's remarks reportedly drew applause "from sections of the audience" -- a group well chosen to appreciate promises of renewed federal largesse -- as he added promises of more federal aid to repair derelict schools, roads, and bridges.

But the dogs are still dead, and one feels increasingly embarrassed for aging redistributionists like Sen. Reid as they try to prop them up in their tattered, pastel tutus and shove them through the hoops one more time, bowing to draw that increasingly reluctant little scattering of applause.

As a refreshingly large and nearly unanimous group of letter-writers to the Review-Journal have been pointing out in response to the senator's remarks in the past week, the fact that those who pay a lot of taxes will get a larger "tax break" (Democrats will only be happy when all "tax breaks" went to those who never paid any taxes in the first place) doesn't change the fact that tax revenues have been growing far beyond what can be explained or justified by inflation and population growth, combined. Washington is raking in money far in excess of what the current tax rates were expected to produce, till even big spenders like Sen. Reid have to root around looking for ever more far-fetched federal programs to subsidize.

Just as if a merchant had accidentally overcharged for a piece of merchandise, so the correct response for the federal government now is to contact those who have overpaid, offering them a refund and a lower rate from here on in.

Sen. Reid believes that if the Nevadans -- all the Americans -- who work so hard to earn their pay are allowed to keep a little more of those earnings, we will "squander" them ... who knows, probably on such frivolities as groceries, children's clothing, housing, and utility bills.

But let Sen. Reid keep his hands on that loot, and he'll put it to much better use -- on such projects as (here I cite the spending items for which Sen. Reid was "honored" in last week's annual pork report of the Citizens Against Government Waste) a $2 million UNLV study of remote airport check-in sites, and another $36 million in dubious and unsolicited "energy project" grants to both of Nevada's major state universities.

Sen. Reid has now three times taken an oath of office in which he vowed to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

It's in Article I, Section 8 of that Constitution that the powers of the Congress are enumerated -- the stated purpose being to limit those powers to the ones enumerated -- among them being the power to coin money, to provide and maintain a Navy, and so forth.

One looks in vain for any listed federal power to collect direct taxes from the citizens to build or repair local schools or bridges or sewer systems, while the tenth amendment further reminds us that any powers not specifically delegated "are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

In slightly plainer English, Sen. Reid would have no business showering our money on this kind of stuff, even if our pockets were bottomless.

Every six years, big-spending Washington Democrat Harry Reid kisses his buddies Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein and Ted Kennedy on the cheeks, pulls on a plaid shirt and a pair of bluejeans, travels back to Nevada, and has himself photographed sitting on a hay bale telling us he's a conservative Nevadan. In fact, if he and his tax-and-spend brethren had their way, they'd be taking more than half our income, rather than leaving us even as much as we're now busy ... in their view ... "squandering."

Vin Suprynowicz is assistant editorial page editor of the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Subscribe to his monthly newsletter by sending $72 to Privacy Alert, 1475 Terminal Way, Suite E for Easy, Reno, NV 89502. His book, "Send in the Waco Killers: Essays on the Freedom Movement, 1993-1998," is available at 1-800-244-2224, or via web site www.thespiritof76.com/wacokillers.html.

Vin Suprynowicz, vin@lvrj.com

"When great changes occur in history, when great principles are involved, as a rule the majority are wrong. The minority are right." -- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926)

"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed -- and thus clamorous to be led to safety -- by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -- H.L. Mencken

Add comment Edit post Add post

Previous Posts:
For once, bureaucratic nightmare has a happy ending
Busting the protection racket
Teachers unions won't say where tax loot would go
A victory in Elko
The hypocrisy of the morally anointed
Driving them off the land
The Last Food Fight
Drug war very effective
What did those 'B averages' really mean?
The questions that are never asked, Part II

Navigation

History

Quotes

Government doesn't work. Never did. Never will. Can't. But there are lots of good people. Love them.

-- Bill St. Clair

The Atlanta Declaration

Every man, woman, and responsible child has an unalienable individual, civil, Constitutional, and human right to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon -- rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission.

-- L. Neil Smith

Reread that pesky first clause of the Second Amendment. It doesn't say what any of us thought it said. What it says is that infringing the right of the people to keep and bear arms is treason. What else do you call an act that endangers "the security of a free state"? And if it's treason, then it's punishable by death. I suggest due process, speedy trials, and public hangings.

-- L. Neil Smith

A Penalty Clause for the Bill of Rights

Any official, appointed or elected, at any level of government, who attempts, through legislative act or other means, to nullify, evade, or avoid the provisions of the first ten amendments to this Constitution, or of the Thirteenth Amendment, shall be summarily removed from office, and, upon conviction, deprived of all pay and benefits including pension, and sentenced to imprisonment for life.

-- L. Neil Smith

Based on 253 journal articles, 99 books, 43 government publications, and some of its own empirical work, the panel couldn't identify a single gun control regulation that reduced violent crime, suicide or accidents.

-- John Lott, commenting on the National Academy of Sciences report on gun control laws.

Who is a libertarian?

Zero Aggression Principle ("Zap")

"A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being, or to advocate or delegate its initiation. Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim."

-- L. Neil Smith

(Formerly called the "Non-Aggression Principle", or "NAP")

Why Did It Have to be... Guns?

Make no mistake: all politicians -- even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership -- hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it's an X-ray machine. It's a Vulcan mind-meld. It's the ultimate test to which any politician -- or political philosophy -- can be put.

If a politician isn't perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash -- for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn't your friend no matter what he tells you.

If he isn't genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody's permission, he's a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.

What his attitude -- toward your ownership and use of weapons -- conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn't trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?

-- L. Neil Smith

Concise

"Tell me," I was once asked, "What do you think about gun control? Give me the short answer." To which I replied, "If you try to take our firearms we will kill you."

-- Mike Vanderboegh

Also from The Atlanta Declaration:

... like going to the bathroom, breathing, eating, sleeping, or making love, it turns out that self-defense is a bodily function one cannot safely or effectively delegate to a second party.

-- L. Neil Smith

This does not mean that "Marijuana should be available by prescription." It means that morphine sulfate should be available in five pound bags at the supermarket for a couple of bucks, like sugar... but probably in a different aisle, to avoid confusion.

-- Vin Suprynowicz

If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your property will be confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property, you will be arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed. If you defend yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These procedures are known as the Rule of Law.

-- Edward Abbey

The state can only survive as long as a majority is programmed to believe that theft isn't wrong if it's called taxation or asset forfeiture or eminent domain, that assault and kidnapping isn't wrong if it's called arrest, that mass murder isn't wrong if it's called war.

-- Bill St. Clair

End the War on Freedom

Sen. Reid fears we'd only 'squander' proposed Bush tax cut